-
Libercareans Agree with Capitalists … and Communists?
10/31/2025
Written by AI … with prompting from Brandon Price
In the polarized world of economic ideologies, where capitalists champion unfettered markets and communists advocate for collective ownership, a lesser-known perspective emerges: Libercareanism. This philosophy, blending the core tenets of liberty with a pragmatic approach to social welfare, finds common ground with both ends of the spectrum. Libercareans celebrate the triumphs of free markets while acknowledging the need for resource distribution, achieving the latter through mechanisms that preserve individual freedom and market efficiency. Let’s explore how Libercareans align with capitalists on wealth creation and personal rights, and with communists on equitable sharing, all while proposing innovative solutions like Universal Basic Income (UBI).
Aligning with Capitalists: The Power of Free Markets and Individual Liberty
At its heart, Libercareanism echoes the capitalist ethos that free markets are engines of prosperity. Capitalists have long argued, and history supports, that open competition, entrepreneurship, and minimal government interference have dramatically increased global wealth and lifted billions out of poverty. From the Industrial Revolution to the tech boom of the 21st century, market-driven innovations have reduced extreme poverty rates from over 80% in the early 1800s to under 10% today. Libercareans wholeheartedly agree: free markets allocate resources efficiently, reward innovation, and foster economic growth that benefits society as a whole.
Central to this agreement is the primacy of liberty. Libercareans, like capitalists, emphasize the individual’s right to pursue happiness without undue coercion. This includes the sacred right to property, what you earn or create is yours to control. In a Libercarean view, this liberty extends to economic choices: individuals should be free to invest, save, or spend as they see fit.
Postponing consumption, for instance, transforms mere money into productive capital. By saving and investing in businesses, tools, or education, people generate compounding returns that drive further wealth creation. This mirrors capitalist principles, where capital accumulation fuels job creation, technological advancement, and overall societal progress.
Libercareans diverge slightly by insisting that true liberty requires safeguards against monopolies or cronyism, but they reject heavy-handed regulations that stifle innovation. Instead, they advocate for transparent rules that ensure markets remain truly free, allowing individuals to thrive based on merit and voluntary exchange.
Bridging to Communists: Resource Distribution Without Market Distortion
While Libercareans champion capitalist freedoms, they also share a key insight with socialists and communists: in believing some level of equitable distribution is beneficial for social stability and human dignity.
Communists, in particular, critique capitalism’s inequalities, arguing that wealth concentration leads to exploitation and that resources should be redistributed to meet everyone’s needs. Libercareans nod in agreement that unchecked disparities can erode liberty—after all, extreme poverty limits one’s ability to exercise true freedom.
However, Libercareans part ways with traditional communist approaches like state-controlled economies or forced collectivization, which they see as violations of individual rights and prone to inefficiency. Instead, they propose market-friendly programs that redistribute resources without distorting incentives. A prime example is Universal Basic Income (UBI), a system where every citizen receives a regular, unconditional cash payment.
UBI actually aligns with some communist ideals by ensuring a basic standard of living for all, reducing poverty and inequality without requiring people to prove their “worthiness.” Yet, it preserves capitalist virtues: recipients can spend the money as they choose, stimulating markets through consumer demand. Unlike welfare bureaucracies that create dependency traps or distort labor markets with means-testing, UBI empowers individuals, allowing them to pursue education, start businesses, or care for families without fear of destitution. Pilots in places like Finland and Kenya have shown UBI boosts entrepreneurship and mental health, proving it can enhance rather than hinder economic vitality.
In essence, Libercareans view UBI as a “liberty dividend”, a way to share society’s collective gains while maintaining the free market’s dynamism. This approach addresses communist concerns about fairness without the authoritarian pitfalls of central planning.
A Synthesis for the Modern World?
Libercareanism isn’t about compromising principles; it’s about synthesizing the best of both worlds. By agreeing with capitalists on the virtues of free markets, liberty, and capital formation, it harnesses proven tools for growth. Simultaneously, by endorsing resource distribution via non-distortive methods like UBI, it promotes a more inclusive society.
In an era of rising inequality and automation-driven job shifts, Libercarean ideas offer a pragmatic path forward. They remind us that true freedom isn’t just about accumulating wealth; it’s about ensuring everyone has the opportunity to participate. Whether you’re a die-hard capitalist or a committed communist, there’s something in Libercareanism that might just make you nod in agreement. After all, in a complex world, the most enduring ideologies are those that evolve.
4 min read
-
The High Cost of Stupidity
How government waste and debt could be keeping you from receiving $500 a month.
Imagine if every adult in the United States received $500 a month from the government. With about 200 million adult citizens, that would add up to a staggering $1.2 trillion a year. It’s a nice thought—extra cash in your pocket every month—but the reality of pulling it off is a lot messier. To make it happen, the government would either need to increase its annual spending by $1.2 trillion or carve that amount out of its current budget, which already sits at roughly $7 trillion per year. That’s a huge chunk of change either way you slice it.
So, could it actually be done? If you ask Elon Musk, the answer might be yes—at least partially. Musk has suggested that the U.S. government could save that much by slashing waste. That’s a bold claim, but it’s not that hard to imagine there’s some fat to trim in a budget as massive as $7 trillion.
One challenge with getting to $500 a month in UBI is that we’re already starting in a hole. We spend almost half the money we need to get there keeping up with the national debt. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects that interest payments on the debt will hit $952 billion in fiscal year 2025, and that number is only going to climb over the next decade. That’s nearly a trillion dollars a year just to service the debt—not to build roads, fund schools, defend the country, or provide every American a cash payment every month, but to pay the interest on money we’ve already spent.
Here’s the kicker: what’s really keeping us from handing out $500 a month isn’t just logistics or budget constraints—it’s our own stupidity. It’s the collective dumb decision to let the national debt balloon to $36 trillion and counting, acting like it’s no big deal. That mountain of debt didn’t appear overnight; it’s the result of years of spending more than we take in, kicking the can down the road for someone else to deal with. And if we ever get serious about tackling it—cutting waste, reducing spending, living within our means—you can bet that same stupidity will rear its head again. People will complain about the short-term pain and say, “See? This was a terrible idea.”
It’s no different from a household that’s been maxing out its credit cards. When you finally stop borrowing and start paying off the balance, you’re not going to have as much to spend each month. Your lifestyle takes a hit. You might have to skip the vacation or eat out less. It’s uncomfortable, but it’s the only way to dig yourself out. The U.S. government is that household, except it’s been racking up debt on a scale most of us can’t even fathom.
Given this mess we got ourselves in, $500 a month for every adult might be a pipe dream right now. But if we stopped being stupid—if we cut waste and got smarter about spending—we could probably swing $500 a month in UBI to every adult citizen in America. It wouldn’t be easy, and it wouldn’t be painless, but it’d be a hell of a lot smarter than what we’ve been doing. The high cost of stupidity has already cost us enough—maybe it’s time to wise up.
4 min read
-
Hello world!
Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start writing!
4 min read
